Why have You forsaken me?

Today is the day when the crucifixion of Christ is celebrated in the Western Christian world.  I have too much sadness because of what is happening among Christians who profess to be servants of the Lord.  Christianity is under attack because Christ is being questioned like Pilate did with him almost 2000 years ago. Today the questioning is by Christians. Some of us, not in my community, doubt the divinity of Christ. More of us believe it but act as if they are the Anti-Christ. Look only at the unending questioning of everyone discussing his own troubles or envying his neighbour because the neighbour happens to be richer.

Look only at the murdering of many innocents and real humans in the name of liberation and freedom in the Middle East. We do not know anymore who is right in Syria as the media continue to favour the armed resistance.

Look at the huge economic problems driving governments in Europe, Canada and the U.S. to bow to excessive speculation and Capitalism. Look at the incredible looting of money by some corporate elites. Who is being disadvantaged but the weary poor and disabled! The poor of Africa included! And the unborn Children too!

One word comes to my thought: “Why have You forsaken me?” uttered by Christ on that cross when he had already trusted his Father. He was probably repeating words from the Psalmist in agony but that was real suffering to the last breath.  

He had already sweat blood on the night when he was to be betrayed by one of his disciples and left alone by the rest to confront Satanic powers. Generations of artists attempted to replicate the picture of his suffering but none was able to gaze into his bleeding heart, except probably his immaculate mother.

And here how can I imagine a young mother who is watching her son being beaten and crucified with such barbaric methods? Where was the Father when His only Son had already surrendered himself to His protection? The Father, I think subject to ecclesial approval,  could not have watched His own Son suffering without the Father himself suffering too with His Son. He was not the cruel judge but the loving Father who shared with His Son the cross of self-giving from eternity. The Gospel tells us that there was darkness over the earth when Jesus died. Nature itself seems to have protested the death of Christ, but something else happened according to received Tradition.  

When the Romans invented the cross as a tool of hanging their enemies and troublemakers, they knew it was a terrorist machine intended for slow killing and torture so that the perceived criminal’s flesh will be eaten by eagles alive if not already dead. The surprise which we sing tonight in the Christian Byzantine Tradition is the descent of Christ that defeated Hades when he visited it in his divine power as Hades expected to swallow him. Hades full of herself was surprised by the visitor and the power of Satan was crushed. How deep is the wisdom of God who does not stop from loving us!

The Truth of Selfishness - My Real Story Today

A little event made me upset today. It should not have if I was dependent on God alone, but as a weak Christian when another Christian and preacher accused me of distorting the history of a certain event that I had published a few days ago, I immediately went on the defensive. I had always thought that he wanted to be at the centre in anything we do. However, he proved to me that he attributed to others the good things that he brought in. In both attitudes mine and his, I find egocentric tendencies which I attribute to Original Sin. First, he is guilty of reacting so aggressively and threatening me without thinking when I called him.  Under any circumstances, if he thought that I was guilty he should have given me the opportunity to explain my position. In Christian tradition, a Christian should first examine his conscience and his motivations and take time in silent prayer before accusing his brother.  Second, I am guilty of the act itself to which he was referring as a distortion of history. In all honesty, I wanted me to be in charge and, while focusing on what I do, I did not imagine that he, out of all men, would feel wounded.  I still have hidden feelings of revenge!

Egoism is at the heart of my thought here and I believe that all of us humans are still under the powerful temptation of sin except for the very few saints living and dead. I want me and my family and my church and my reputation and my country and my health and my wealth and my pleasure to be for me because they are my extension. I want my self-expansion and at least that history would recognize me and my contribution!  

Who does not want to be eternal? Is not this why the ancients wanted to have male offspring?  Is not this why barren women were considered a shame in ancient and, to-date, in most Eastern cultures? Is not this why Egyptian ancient kings built the Pyramids and why today we build skyscrapers? Is not that why most humans attempt to survive by adapting to the wishes of the powerful in this world including those who serve others?  

Who does not want to be loved? Who does not want to be appreciated regardless of his own malicious words and acts? And when he is loved, does not he want to still be loved by everyone and admired by everyone? It is in the heart of every heart that still lives with some wishful thinking that the earthly things can satisfy him.  This is why to answer the first question “Who does not want to be eternal?” we need to answer the second question “Who does not want to be loved?” To live eternally in happiness I must love but to love I must be loved by the One who can powerfully hold me eternally in himself.  This is the truth from the Resurrection of Christ which Ratzinger ably explained in his book “Introduction to Christianity.”  See  it here at:http://www.ignatiusinsight.com/features2007/ratzinger_resurrectionitc_mar07.asp

From a logical perspective it makes sense that the vast majority of those who die in the grace of God will have to be purified before they can experience God’s glorious love in heaven. In Eastern Christian tradition, God is present everywhere, including heaven and hell. The Devil who hates God experiences his huge loss in hell and this is why he suffers most. The angels who love God experience their utter joy in heaven and this is why they enjoy love.  But I have another explanation of heaven and hell and purgatory which is subject to approval by ecclesial authorities. Hell is a state of total self-closed beings – Each of them hates everyone else and hates God who still loves everyone including the lost. Heaven is a state of utter openness to love and communion. The joy of being in heaven is that of self-giving which starts here on earth because God himself is self-giving of love or self-giving of Father to Son and Son to Father eternally by the power of the Holy Spirit who unites them. Purgatory is a state of temporary suffering for anyone who is longing and willing to give himself in love, and yet has not reached his potential of perfect love for the sake of love i.e. for the sake of God in whom Man can be eternally saved and find his resurrection.

I wish I can express my feeling of utter helplessness alone but at the same time I hope that God and people I know will forgive me and forgive my fellow Christian preacher and that each of us will forgive each other; for I think God uses our finite weakness to still get us closer to him and to each other which is the communion of the Church.

Behold, I stand at the door and knock

As we enter into the Holy Week of the Passion of Christ, I must recognize that we spend too much time on connecting with the world around each one of us than on contemplating God in his love to you and to me individually. Not only in entertainment or work, but also in service of the church and good causes we are drifting away from thinking of our Savior and God Jesus Christ.  The Internet is a good thing but how we use it makes a difference. 

Even in the Mass I attended on Sunday, I felt I was talking with others but not with God. The Mass is necessary for the community. The more we are in the habit of memorizing what we do, the more we do it without thinking or reflection. However, I am invited to focus on Christ more than merely a theatrical play. The Eucharist is the epitome of God's grace. How badly did  I misuse it! Christ himself becomes our food as the bread and wine are transformed to his real body and blood. He unites us all in this communion. In Catholic theology this is called the Real Presence.

Many years ago, before email and the Internet became possible, I read this magnificent word in a Christian publication. The priest was telling himself "How many years have I served the altar of the Lord rather than serving the Lord of the altar??" 

My life and yours will not be eternal here on earth.  "Behold, I stand at the door and knock; if any one hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and eat with him, and he with me. " says the Lord. 

Let us think again!

A Man of Faith and Unity

When we celebrate Easter, we recall to memory Pope Shenouda III, the outstanding late Patriarch of the Coptic Orthodox Church - a man who departed to God on March 17 and who greatly influenced by his presence the pastoral work of many Christians in Egypt and the Churches of the Middle East. His heroic contribution is far more than mere pastoral care of the Coptic Orthodox Church or theological dialogue between the Catholic Church and the Non-Chalcedonian (called also Old Oriental) Orthodox Churches in which he significantly contributed.  He was an energetic person who went everywhere he could go to preach and teach the Christian faith according to the early Church of Alexandria.  His contribution to the welfare of his faithful included direct contact with those in authority and those who listened to him among his faithful in his weekly answers to their questions in personal, social, and theological matters. So much can be said about his commitment to the monastic life in Egypt which flourished during his pontificate, or to his enormous writings accessible by the ordinary and simple folks as also about his relationship with other Christian Churches and communions as well as the President of Egypt and other political leaders, Muslim leaders and organizations. But let me only present his contribution to the dialogue for Christian unity.

This faithful servant of God, as Pope Benedict XVI called him in his letter of condolences to the Coptic Orthodox Church, initiated a new idea and presented it to other theologians from Chalcedonian/Greek and Non-Chalcedonian Orthodox Churches as well as theologians from the Catholic Church. The theologians meeting in Vienna in 1971 agreed to use a new language and new terms in coherently expressing the disputed doctrine of the divinity and humanity of Christ at the Ecumenical Council of Chalcedon where the schism between some of the above Churches took place in 451 AD partly due to using old philosophical terms that were probably misunderstood. In 1951, on the occasion of the 15th centuries anniversary of the Council, Pope Pius XII had expressed his conviction that there is little, if any, disagreement between the Catholic Church and the Non-Chalcedonian Churches on the doctrine of the two natures in Christ promulgated by the Council. With the theological agreement in 1971, the proposed solution now had to be ratified by ecclesial authorities in Rome and the Patriarchates of Orthodox Churches both Chalcedonians who agree on the decisions of Chalcedon and Non-Chalcedonians who did not accept the decisions of Chalcedon. 


In 1972 Shenouda, newly elected Pope of the Coptic Orthodox Church, visited the major Chalcedonian/Greek Orthodox Churches to soothe the relations with them. While in Lebanon before the end of his ecumenical tour, he received an invitation from Pope Paul VI for a visit to the Vatican. It was in his Easter message in 1973 that Pope Shenouda III announced to his Coptic people that he accepted the invitation and gestured that Pope Paul VI would send with him a relic of St. Athanasius the Great, one of Shenouda’s great predecessors who defended the faith in the divinity of Christ in the 4^th century, to its original place in Egypt. In May 1973, Pope Paul VI received Pope Shenouda III in the Vatican and together they signed a common declaration on the Incarnation of the Son of God. See the Declaration here:

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/speeches/1973/may/documents/hf_p-vi_spe_19730510_dichiarazione-comune_en.html

Even when our Orthodox brothers may question the "Development of Doctrine" you can see here how one of their profound theologians, Shenouda, used new expressions of the doctrine to re-present it anew according to the current thought yet he did not rescind what the Coptic Orthodox tradition believed with regard to the doctrine of the Incarnation of Christ; for he willed unity as much as he could push it and in the way he understood in his conscience. May be for him, he was restoring the recognition of the Holy See of Rome of the Coptic theological understanding. In fact the Council of Chalcedon did not condemn Dioscorus, then Patriarch of Alexandria, for any theological error but because Dioscorus dared to excommunicate the Pope of Rome before the Council! This is, in my opinion, a case of  the Development of Doctrine since new expressions are used to illuminate an old doctrine. The Ecumenical Second Vatican Council had said it in 1965.  It does not mean that the doctrine changes in itself but that the the Church perceives it more fully as she grows in her experience or uses new expressions that fit the culture/language she lives in. 

This was a moment of celebration in which the two sister Churches of Rome and Alexandria embraced each other again after 15 centuries of enmity and moved wisely to re-establish full visible unity.  The great Catholic ecclesiologist and Cardinal, Yves Congar, commented about this declaration that it included the only concrete Christological dogmatic agreement between two heads of Churches. Shenouda III had the dogmatic agreement ratified by the Coptic Orthodox Synod in 1986. Shenouda remained committed to the reunion of the Churches. This was a wise move too by Pope Shenouda;  for by accepting the invitation of Paul VI, he opened the way for more mutual understanding of theologies and, more importantly, the world heard of this Coptic Orthodox tiny Church  for the first time in centuries.  To his credit, he was a magnificent contributor to the doctrinal agreements reached between the Chalcedonian and Non-Chalcedonian Orthodox Churches in 1989. Both families of Churches found nothing that would stand in their full reunion in terms of tradition or doctrine. In 2000, Pope Shenouda III received Blessed Pope John Paul II in Cairo and in the Mass celebrated by the Roman Pontiff, Pope Shenouda addressed him with warm words about the ecumenical results achieved so far by the Catholic and Orthodox Churches. In the same meeting Pope Shenouda referred to his warm relations with Sheikh Dr. Tantawi, the late Grand Imam of Al-Azhar which meant that the patriarch was a moderate man with a large heart for Non-Christians. Even when in Pope Shenouda's mind, Christian unity may have meant first restoring unity among Christians of Egypt to come back to the "mother Church" i.e. the Coptic Orthodox Church, it still was encouraging to see the patriarch use his energy to open theological dialogues with the Catholic Church and the Greek Orthodox Churches without compromising his own traditional doctrines of faith. He did not accept the Catholic dogmas of Purgatory and Filioque although these same dogmas were accepted by the Jacobites (including Coptic representatives) and Greek Orthodox bishops in the Council of Florence (1439 AD). He maintained a distance against the Assyrian Orthodox Church accusing them of keeping the Nestorian heresy even when Pope John Paul II had received Patriarch Mar Dinkha IV of the Assyrian Orthodox Church and the two issued a Christological declaration in 1994 that in substance was not different from that issued by Pope Paul VI and Pope Shenouda III in 1973. In many ways the energetic Pope Shenouda III resembled Blessed John Paul the Great not the least in his outspoken courage to deal with heresy such as Jehovah's Witnesses, his pastoral concerns for the youth, and his patriotic stance for which he is remembered as saying "Not that we live in Egypt, but that Egypt lives in us."

Here is the lesson we learn from such a Christian giant. He laboured with full courage to advance the cause of his Church and by doing that he advanced the cause of Christian unity.  Pope Shenouda's concern was primarily about a local Church - the Church of Egyptians including those in the diaspora.  And it seems, at least to me, that his concern for Christian unity was a defense of the Coptic Orthodox faith as truly orthodox (i.e. living in the right faith) before Catholic and Greek Orthodox authorities. In Benedict XVI, the same can be said: In theological dialogue, theologians representing the Catholic Church express (probably in new terms) the doctrines of faith of the Catholic Church in order to clear misunderstandings of the past, but there is no compromise about Catholic faith in theological dialogue with other Christian communions or Churches. This was the basis of the common declaration on the doctrine of Justification by the Catholic Church and the Lutheran World Federation  in 1999 in which both sides recognized that, although there remain some differences on justification by grace, mutual condemnations with regard to this doctrine in the 16th century no longer apply today.


Now we ask ourselves, what do ordinary Christians do to help advance Christian unity? We do not have to be theologians.  We do not have to build shrines and churches but at least open up to the great Eastern Tradition which very few know about; learn and dialogue with Orthodox neighbours; live a life of charity towards Christians in pain in the Middle East whether Catholic or Orthodox; help them to survive as Christians; give financially to the cause of many Christians in need there; and appreciate dialogue with moderate Muslims in the Middle East. After all, the Catholic Church gives priority to unity. Unity in Truth starts with the dialogue of love. Today, rich Catholics in the Western hemisphere have an opportunity to help their fellow Christians in the Middle East and alleviate their feelings of helplessness.  In a larger context, people of good will need to help a process of permanent and just peace among all citizens of the Middle East. This is certainly not happening today as we see powers of every political and ideological stripe fighting for a larger piece of the land or at least supporting a destabilization of existing peace through armed rebellion in the name of bringing a concept of freedom and risking, in the mean time, many lives. No one can ignore the vicious attacks on Libya by American, French and British bombers to free it from one dictator in the name of supporting freedom while they were creating more tribal divisions in that country as one example. Christian unity will, on the contrary, start the process of peace in the Middle East.


Nice words from our pastors are not enough. Exhortations without real action are empty! If Orthodox Christians are still scared of the Catholic Church fearing she is there to absorb them, Catholics must reassure them that they are valued with their tradition and in the event of full unity their tradition will be fully respected. This is the role that Eastern Catholics are here to play. The Orthodox Churches are part of us since Apostolic times and an opportunity or rather a call for restoring their unity with the Catholic Church is urgent and timely. Orthodox must recognize the only international voice of Christians which is performed by the Pope, Bishop of Rome.  Rome still wields the most formidable power in defense of Christians and Non-Christians with her diplomatic relations among nations and is the only sovereign country represented in Arab nations.  On the other hand, bishops of the Catholic Church headed by the Bishop of Rome may well pray and work together with those of the local Orthodox Churches to ignite again the fervor for Christian unity in the faithful. As I indicated in my letter to Pope Benedict XVI last October, this year is the 50th anniversary of the start of Vatican II, and would be a great initiative for His Holiness to convoke an Ecumenical Council to which bishops of the Orthodox Churches are invited to participate together with bishops of the Catholic Church to resolve what remains of doctrinal issues and the primacy issue.  This same proposal was uttered by Pope Shenouda III in 1974. He thought that differences between the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Churches would be solved within a few weeks of such an Ecumenical Council. Again we must remember history. As Blessed Pope John XXIII was the first Catholic leader to recognize the need of the Catholic Church to enter into ecumenical dialogue with the rest of Christians, so was Shenouda III the first Coptic Orthodox Patriarch to realize and actively enter from his perspective into the same dialogue.  


It is in unity that we find strength as Christians. It is in unity that our Christian brothers in the Arab world can survive. The Lord has risen. Let’s imitate Him and strive to follow him as Patriarch Shenouda III did in his energetic work; for the Lord is generous in His love and He has conquered death for us!

Pope Shenouda III of the Coptic Orthodox Church

I am very saddened by the passing away today of Pope Shenouda III, the outstanding Patriarch of the Coptic Orthodox Church (and,  according to the Coptic Orthodox tradition, officially Pope of Alexandria and Patriarch of the See of St. Mark.) His Holiness Shenouda III contributed significantly to the theological dialogue between the Orthodox Churches and the Catholic Church. His pastoral work and charismatic preaching influenced many thinkers especially in the Churches of the Middle East. 

His personality was such a humble and rich person who was able to bring thousands of followers and admirers to not only hear him in his weekly sermons at St. Mark Cathedral in Cairo and in Alexandria but also to share and laugh with him when he joked about things including himself. 

For forty years, I followed closely the words of this charismatic man, first as an attendee of his sermons and lectures in Cairo, then in Toronto when he visited his people a few times in the 1980s, 1990s, and later in the 21st century, or on YouTube through the Internet. 

May God give him peace in heaven and continue the ecumenical work that this distinguished leader brought forward in the Churches.